Nah.. Just a bit of fun until the league starts. As they say the League is where it's at. Looking at the times in CK for my current horses compared to the horses that have posted the times here I'm probably able to beat most of the times here between 5f and 1m but that would require running them and finding the right races on the right race course and that's time consuming. Better to try and beat my CK times .

Which are?

Well the league will reveal all and it's not that far away from starting. FWIW I've posted my times in bits and pieces in my posts and since the trials in October I've been studying for exams which I've just sat in Early Dec so the times I've got are not that different from previous. Slightly faster of course but then others have posted similar times a long while ago too.



58.22 and that was back in July.. better ask Jalupen how much faster he's gone as I think he'll be the man to beat there.



Also in July.. I wonder how much faster Andy has gone too.

But half the fun is not knowing and hoping that you'll do well in the league .

These courses you're achieving the records on are a myth.

The records should only account for UK & Ireland racecourses.

It does say 'World' records.

They are world records any course any horse in your game
as long as you post an image as proof thats fine

Moone Valley and Warwick Farm are real tracks anyway

Why would there be 'mythical' courses on starters orders? I don't particularly follow Aussie racing and even I've heard of Moonee valley, home of the cox plate.

There should also be constraints of the type of ground conditions.

I believe the WR times should be clocked on good ground, no slower, no faster.

To improve fairness & equality.

Especially as some of us are using different schedules and don't have these donkey tracks in our game.

Epsom & Goodwood are the only tracks on hard ground that you can mount a challenge on and waiting for those conditions could take years.

I personally think its fine the way it is but that is only my opinion
I do think it would take alot of time to filter out anything apart from records on good ground
right now all a player has to do is check the record times in there game
then post an image
this can be done very quickly in 5 mins
you suggestion it would be very time consuming
a record is a record IMO
Also Luke people play this game from other counties AUS IRE USA and use those versions of the game
would be wrong not to allow those players from those countries to have there records recognised

if anyone lese agrees with Luke i am happy to change the format i am only updating the records they are your records

I agree with PJR, the records should stay as they are, no point messing with the ground! Its not something any of us can interfere with, might just a bit of luck that u get hard conditions on the day your horse runs the perfect race.

Its like saying Usain Bolt should have a WR for both running in dry conditions n in the rain! Conditions are just part of sport.

Wait, are you telling me these records are not completed by horses from the players stables?

That's like Gatlin claiming Bolt's record is his because he's run in the same race as him.

Jesus there was me thinking some of you had monsters but there just AI records.

most of the records are with homebreds
but thats not Necessary to meet the Criteria

Luke these are records of the fastest ever times recorded in so5 thats the whole idea

Dunno about that PJ. Of the ones up to 2m (and including 2m) the only one that's game bred is at 1m3f. The rest (I'm pretty certain) are homebred.

ya i put totally the wrong thing down i did mean homebred
bred by human players

sorry for confusion