Author |
Message |
SiriusChill
Group 1 winner
Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 6:57 am Posts: 2878
|
 Re: Weekly Reaction
http://www.startersorders.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=11977&p=121822&hilit=listed#p121822You said this John, right? Why not for the good of the league and the lesser trainers and even the other top trainers...you abide by this honorable statement? Quote: I think ( and probably no one will agree with me on this) but I've always thought it and done it ( My 2 group 1 sprinter winners) will not be running in any group race below group1's, I think it's just plundering the races for u own benefit then when u do that.
I think there should be a rule that if u horse has run in the first 3 or 4 of a group 1 then u cant run in Group3's or Listed races. Those races are for those rated animals.
 This is what I am going on about. It's not jealousy over better horses or me bumming because my horses stink. You stole a cheap listed race with a 4 time group 1 winner. Is this about the dual code champ.? Getting as many wins as possible? Is it something to do with your stated goal of having a great win % above anything else? It's just this one race I'm on about and I think you plundered it without thinking about the other trainers. We need more listed races.
_________________https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClB2FZ7Qvwq0Ons_6jN1lAQ - Watch The Cats! 24-7 Webcam Of Non-Profit Cat Rescue
|
Tue Feb 07, 2017 9:57 pm |
|
 |
ghostzapper74
Group 1 winner
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:03 am Posts: 4148 Location: Wales
|
 Re: Weekly Reaction
SiriusChill wrote: http://www.startersorders.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=11977&p=121822&hilit=listed#p121822You said this John, right? Why not for the good of the league and the lesser trainers and even the other top trainers...you abide by this honorable statement? Quote: I think ( and probably no one will agree with me on this) but I've always thought it and done it ( My 2 group 1 sprinter winners) will not be running in any group race below group1's, I think it's just plundering the races for u own benefit then when u do that.
I think there should be a rule that if u horse has run in the first 3 or 4 of a group 1 then u cant run in Group3's or Listed races. Those races are for those rated animals.
 This is what I am going on about. It's not jealousy over better horses or me bumming because my horses stink. You stole a cheap listed race with a 4 time group 1 winner. Is this about the dual code champ.? Getting as many wins as possible? Is it something to do with your stated goal of having a great win % above anything else? It's just this one race I'm on about and I think you plundered it without thinking about the other trainers. We need more listed races. I have 0% interest in winning any championship, I've said that from day 1. I don't care what my win percentage is I do what's best for my horses, I run them in the right races and that was the right race for that horse. And u talk about that race like my horse would have been a 1-10 on shot, if u told me before the race who was favourite I would have said the 3yo's of Pauls - Steve's. That to me was my best win of the week because he was a top 3yo and now he was the under dog trying to beat the younger brigade of sprinters. I will now not have any runners in then Gp1H'caps because If I win one then I suppose I'll be classed as cheating. And u didn't answer my question about Present Abbey, if I bring her back and try to win the gp3 Florence Nightingale Chase after she's won a group 1 this year will it be cheating ! Answer me this question and we can all move on.
|
Tue Feb 07, 2017 10:24 pm |
|
 |
SiriusChill
Group 1 winner
Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 6:57 am Posts: 2878
|
 Re: Weekly Reaction
I have no answer for your question. This is the flat side I am concerned with. Just pleasssssse give us minnows a break the next time a listed race comes your way and remember these words... Quote: I think ( and probably no one will agree with me on this) but I've always thought it and done it ( My 2 group 1 sprinter winners) will not be running in any group race below group1's, I think it's just plundering the races for u own benefit then when u do that.
I think there should be a rule that if u horse has run in the first 3 or 4 of a group 1 then u cant run in Group3's or Listed races. Those races are for those rated animals.
I loved this statement when you made it and now you've gone and done this. Moving on now.
_________________https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClB2FZ7Qvwq0Ons_6jN1lAQ - Watch The Cats! 24-7 Webcam Of Non-Profit Cat Rescue
|
Tue Feb 07, 2017 11:10 pm |
|
 |
ghostzapper74
Group 1 winner
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:03 am Posts: 4148 Location: Wales
|
 Re: Weekly Reaction
SiriusChill wrote: I have no answer for your question. This is the flat side I am concerned with. Just pleasssssse give us minnows a break the next time a listed race comes your way and remember these words... Quote: I think ( and probably no one will agree with me on this) but I've always thought it and done it ( My 2 group 1 sprinter winners) will not be running in any group race below group1's, I think it's just plundering the races for u own benefit then when u do that.
I think there should be a rule that if u horse has run in the first 3 or 4 of a group 1 then u cant run in Group3's or Listed races. Those races are for those rated animals.
I loved this statement when you made it and now you've gone and done this. Moving on now. Last word on this, I'm not having much of a flat team next season so it wont happen again. Lets move on to the Breeders Cup .
|
Tue Feb 07, 2017 11:15 pm |
|
 |
SiriusChill
Group 1 winner
Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 6:57 am Posts: 2878
|
 Re: Weekly Reaction
It's cool bud. This just sticks in me the wrong way. I'm right. Your right. We're all right. More fodder for offseason I guess.
_________________https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClB2FZ7Qvwq0Ons_6jN1lAQ - Watch The Cats! 24-7 Webcam Of Non-Profit Cat Rescue
|
Tue Feb 07, 2017 11:28 pm |
|
 |
NPG319
Group 1 winner
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 4:39 am Posts: 2498 Location: South Australia
|
 Re: Weekly Reaction
Githyanki wrote: I am not sure I like conversations where one trainer is guilt tripping another to sit out races, that's not the solution to spreading out the wins, group and listed in my view are wins that need to be earned not given. More lower tier handicaps graded (group?) handicaps or indeed simply more races, so we do not diminish the group schedule, is.
But you will never please everyone no matter what is done. Let's not finish the season on a sour note hey?
Josh +1
|
Tue Feb 07, 2017 11:36 pm |
|
 |
ghostzapper74
Group 1 winner
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:03 am Posts: 4148 Location: Wales
|
 Re: Weekly Reaction
Githyanki wrote: I am not sure I like conversations where one trainer is guilt tripping another to sit out races, that's not the solution to spreading out the wins, group and listed in my view are wins that need to be earned not given. More lower tier handicaps graded (group?) handicaps or indeed simply more races, so we do not diminish the group schedule, is.
But you will never please everyone no matter what is done. Let's not finish the season on a sour note hey?
Josh Josh I've been saying this for the last 3 season's that we need more 0-90 - 0-100 races, there are loads for the top trainers but we need to run a few more of those h'caps a week so all trainers feel like they can win races every week. I feel like we lose a few trainers ( newbies) every year because they enter the horses and struggle and give up after a few weeks. Just my take.
|
Tue Feb 07, 2017 11:52 pm |
|
 |
Wannabe
Group 2 winner
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:22 pm Posts: 739 Location: Fife, Scotland
|
 Re: Weekly Reaction
ghostzapper74 wrote: Josh I've been saying this for the last 3 season's that we need more 0-90 - 0-100 races, there are loads for the top trainers but we need to run a few more of those h'caps a week so all trainers feel like they can win races every week. I feel like we lose a few trainers ( newbies) every year because they enter the horses and struggle and give up after a few weeks. Just my take.
I just looked on TOM at the trainers logs and I think you are right about losing trainers John. Most of the bottom 10 trainers have only run horses in a handfull of races. I think there should be more lower handicap races at the 0-85 range so that the lesser trainers can enter races against horses at their own level. Maybe even have some bigger money or feature races at the lower levels to encourage the lesser trainers. Most of the low level handicap races have prize money of less than £20,000. What about one feature 0-85 handicap each week with £100,000 prize money. One problem which I often see in races is that newbie trainers think their horses are better than they are and enter horses in races that are too far above their level and when these horses run poorly it discourages them from staying in the league. I have seen horses rated at 90 running in group races and finishing about 20 lengths behind the winner. The standard of horses at the top level is so far above what a newbies horses are. I am relatively experienced in the league and have horses with full bars that have won 20 G1 races in the game and these horses struggle to win 0-100 races, so what chance newbies have unless we have more low level races and we encourage them to stick to these races. I think the lure of running in a big money G1 race like the Derby is too great for some trainers. I don't know if it can be done in TOM or if we want to do it, but set a minimum handicap for some of the group races. If newbies can't enter lesser horses in G1 races it may encourage them to run in handicap races where they have more chance. The only problem I can see with this is that it might discourage some trainers.
|
Wed Feb 08, 2017 1:40 am |
|
 |
NPG319
Group 1 winner
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 4:39 am Posts: 2498 Location: South Australia
|
 Re: Weekly Reaction
This topic swirls around my head a lot.
Do we add more races? 40 races per week on the flat and hunt?
I can only go by Australian racing but I suspect it would be the same the world over - there are plenty of small towns around Oz that have a race track and they have their own Cup meeting. The prize money is boosted but it's still a race for low handicap horses. Maybe we can add races like this? Have some Cup races at 0-80 then 0-85 and then 0-90 etc. up to 0-110 and make them over assorted distances (which they are in Oz). Maybe trot out some custom tracks that other players have made and use them?
I also think we need hunt races that are much lower rated. I don't think 0-110 is low enough - I think we need to go down to 0-80 or 0-90 at the least.
As I said before the start of last season - you need to keep the new players and the casual players engaged or they will drift off.
|
Wed Feb 08, 2017 3:54 am |
|
 |
delmonty1964
Group 3 winner
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2016 10:49 am Posts: 678 Location: torquay . devon
|
 Re: Weekly Reaction
john is class trainer if i was him i put that horse in listed race he said no other race to enter so he did respect to mr morgan he is better trainer then by far
|
Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:52 am |
|
 |
pjrhodes1970
Group 1 winner
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 8:48 pm Posts: 15187 Location: Republic of Ireland
|
 Re: Weekly Reaction
2 winners for me on the final day of the week
Noble Endevour Won the 4th race of his career from only his 5th start his best distance is 10 furlongs so dropping him to a mile and giving weight away was a big risk but it paid off great ride by the jockey timed it well to win the Group 3 Autum Stakes he has won at 8,9 & 10 furlongs now serious effort must admit i thought Kevs horse had me but was a deceptive angle.
Jenny Bond After a disappointing effort in the RSA at Cheltenham Jenny is back to winning ways. She has been a bit of a late bloomer.
Congratulations to all the winners and placers thanks to the team & great comms as always lads this season is flying by
|
Wed Feb 08, 2017 8:34 am |
|
 |
Githyanki
Group 1 winner
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:16 pm Posts: 2440
|
 Re: Weekly Reaction
I run horses in races they are going to get smashed in all the time, including a stack of flat group races where none of my horses have any hope at all, but I'd rather have the freedom to do so than not, I try and get my whole team out each week regardless of prospects, taking people out of G1's for me would not be a good thing, I view the entry/rating cap to be working.
I tend to think with more race options they can be competitive in and maybe higher money prizes or graded/group handicaps the issue will be self policing. Trouble with being new is more about the gulf between good in league and good in game, you don't find out good in game is meaningless until your unbeatable wonder horse gets smashed week in week out, I know from my own experience last season how disheartening that can be.
And in an effort not to totally derail this thread, bad week for me, one g2 winner on the jumps which was a nice bonus and a 2yo who nearly sneaked up for a group flat, but otherwise not good enough or just too heavy.
|
Wed Feb 08, 2017 9:07 am |
|
 |
Moliets_Surfer
Handicapper
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:18 pm Posts: 424 Location: Germany
|
 Re: Weekly Reaction
I don't want to win a Listed race when I know it's only won because others are so friendly not to enter their better horses. Everything must be earned this is the motivation. I can't be that you play 8 seasons in game and win 30 online races. When I get smashed in Group races I concentrate on Handicaps. I don't understand this instant success must have, maybe SO online league is the wrong place for you. Maybe a high prize money handicap final and some more lower Hcp races but don't gift everything. You can get Group horses for the OL with normal playing, not 50 but be happy when you have those stable pearls and try to get better.
|
Wed Feb 08, 2017 9:46 am |
|
 |
simpleminds
Group 1 winner
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 5:56 pm Posts: 5746 Location: uk
|
 Re: Weekly Reaction
I have won Many Group 1 races on the jumps but never won a group 1 on the flat I have had a group 3 winner so finally after about 6 Seasons going back to when Rich run the League I get a Group 1 Winner and a 2yo too and to Beat a John Morgan Beast Shinko Dancer after two Bad weeks over the Jumps I can Celebrate a Group 1 Winner on the Flat with Clare Grogan. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfqPJp7Q7qEGray
_________________simple in mind but wonderful in young lifehttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNzbn9 ... idx5pNkHaQ
|
Wed Feb 08, 2017 9:53 am |
|
 |
pjrhodes1970
Group 1 winner
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 8:48 pm Posts: 15187 Location: Republic of Ireland
|
 Re: Weekly Reaction
simpleminds wrote: I have won Many Group 1 races on the jumps but never won a group 1 on the flat I have had a group 3 winner so finally after about 6 Seasons going back to when Rich run the League I get a Group 1 Winner and a 2yo too and to Beat a John Morgan Beast Shinko Dancer after two Bad weeks over the Jumps I can Celebrate a Group 1 Winner on the Flat with Clare Grogan. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfqPJp7Q7qEGray HEHE IT HAD TO BE CLARE Jenny Bond Clare Grogan double thats one for doug and martin well done Gray Hey lads the beer went flat this week
|
Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:21 am |
|
 |
|